ENCLOSURE NO.2.
COPY.
103
September 28.
My dear Witham,
Many thanks for your note, David Kung is anxious
on two points. One that information from his files might
leak out to the Wang Ching-hui people, or to the Japanese,
and, the other, that innocent men might suffer if imprison-
ment and not a fine is imposed, since he (David) is solely
responsible and should take the consequences for the breach
of Hong Kong laws.
If a fine is imposed then the names of others will
not matter, but if imprisonment is to be the punishment then
David says he should be the one to stand trial.
While this is a proper and fine stand to take I
am wondering if it is wise. I do not tell him it is not.
After all there are the relations existing between our country
and China that have to be considered. If anyone is to be
arrested then it should be David, but to arrest him would
bring about an exposure of disinterestedness in China that
would please Japan (an aggressor) and delight the aggressors
against whom we are engaged in war. David is, after all,
representing a Chinese Government organ, and that organ should
be entitled to privileges seeing that Great Britain is a
member of the League of Nations and is entitled to, if she
so desires, to take action to assist China, a victim of
aggression, against Japan. However, that is understood by
the authorities here, and there is no reason why I should
mention it, except in connection with possible repercussions.
In this connection I recall that it was David's
father who adjusted the difficulties with the Sinkiang
authorities who were acting to prevent the British Consulate
at Kashgar from using their own wireless set. The Embassy
got me to press for action to have the wireless set spare
parts released by the Sinking people, and I did so act.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.